AnokaNaturalResources.com
Home || Contact Us

Rivers & Streams Directory.

  1. Chemical Monitoring
  2. Biological Monitoring
  3. Impaired Streams List
  4. Stream Hydrology

Programs & Services

Stream Chemical Monitoring

Stream Biomonitoring

Stream Hydrology Monitoring

Projects

Total Maximum Daily Load & Special Studies

Maps & Data

Waterhsed Maps Use Mapping Utility

Water Quality Data for each Watershed Use Data Access Utility

Lake Water Quality Summaries

Still have Questions?

Jamie Schurbon
Anoka Conservation District
Water Quality Specialist
763/434-2030 ext.12

Steve Heiskary,
MN Pollution Control Agency
Lakes & Toxics
651/296-7217

Other Resources

US Environmental Protection Agency - Invertebrate Biomonitoring Methods

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Biological Monitoring

Volunteer Stream Monitoring Partnership (VSMP)

Biological Monitoring

Seelye Brook

Monitoring Location at Hwy 7, Oak Grove
Monitored By Anoka Conservation District staff
Number of Years Monitored 5 yrs
Background: Seelye Brook originates in southwestern Isanti County and flows south through northwest Anoka County, draining into the Rum River just east of the sampling site. This stream is low-gradient, like most other streams in the area. It has a silty or sandy bottom and lacks riffle-pool sequences. In many areas the stream has a good forest canopy overhead. It is a moderate to large stream for Anoka County, with a typical baseflow width of 20-25 feet.
The sampling site is in the road right of way of the Highway 7 crossing. The bridge footings and poured concrete are a significant feature of the sampling site, which is otherwise sandy-bottom. This site also experiences scour during high flow because flow is constricted under the bridge. Banks are steep and undercut. A few snags overhang the stream, but otherwise invertebrate habitat is sparse.

Results: Biological data indicated a slightly below average condition for Anoka County, but 2003 results were consistent with those seen in the past. No extremely pollution sensitive families were found, a few moderately sensitive families were present, but most were generalists.

Limited supplemental water chemistry readings taken during biomonitoring did not raise any "red flags."
Discussion: Chemical monitoring from 1999 data showed relatively good water quality. Therefore, habitat degradation may be the prime reason for a mediocre biological community.

< PREVIOUS: Rum River North | NEXT: Springbrook >