AnokaNaturalResources.com
Home || Contact Us

Rivers & Streams Directory.

  1. Chemical Monitoring
  2. Biological Monitoring
  3. Impaired Streams List
  4. Stream Hydrology

Programs & Services

Stream Chemical Monitoring

Stream Biomonitoring

Stream Hydrology Monitoring

Projects

Total Maximum Daily Load & Special Studies

Maps & Data

Waterhsed Maps Use Mapping Utility

Water Quality Data for each Watershed Use Data Access Utility

Lake Water Quality Summaries

Still have Questions?

Jamie Schurbon
Anoka Conservation District
Water Quality Specialist
763/434-2030 ext.12

Steve Heiskary,
MN Pollution Control Agency
Lakes & Toxics
651/296-7217

Other Resources

US Environmental Protection Agency - Invertebrate Biomonitoring Methods

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Biological Monitoring

Volunteer Stream Monitoring Partnership (VSMP)

Biological Monitoring

Ford Brook

Monitored By Anoka Conservation District
Number of Years Monitored 5.5 yrs
Background: Ford Brook originates in northwestern Anoka County from Ekstrom Lake. It flows southward to northern Ramsey where it joins Trott Brook and eventually enters the Rum River. This stream has some riffles and pools but is predominantly silty-bottom. The surrounding watershed is developing quickly but still contains large areas of undeveloped land. Many residential lots in this area are 5 acres.

The sampling site is in the road right of way on the south side of Highway 63. This site has a rocky bottom with both riffles and pools. Deadfalls and overhanging bank vegetation are also common at this site.

Results
In 2006 only spring sampling occurred. The 2006 data was similar to previous years, indicating an average or slightly above average condition compared to other Anoka County streams. The total number of families was slightly above the county average, number of EPT families was slightly above average, and the Family Biotic Index was solidly above average. As in previous years, the dominant family was a moderately pollution-sensitive mayfly, a good sign of a quality stream.
Discussion
2006 results are an improvement over 2005 when invertebrate abundance was low and stream health indices were lower than usual. This suggests that poor results in 2005 were due to environmental variability, not a developing problem.
Water chemistry in Ford Brook has been monitored in the past, and good water quality was found except for elevated chlorides and conductivity, which were not found to regularly exceed the tolerances of aquatic life, and probably do not do so even periodically based upon the rich biota present. Supplemental water quality monitoring conducted during biomonitoring did not indicate sub-standard water quality (see table above).
Significant development pressure is expected along Ford Brook and throughout its watershed in the coming years. Maintaining the good condition of this stream will be dependent upon careful siting of developments, carefully thought-out management to make sure stormwater discharges to the stream are high quality, and maintenance of buffers of natural vegetation along the stream.

< PREVIOUS: Coon Creek | NEXT: Hardwood Creek >